FCC Commissioners Spar Over Wireless Competition
How competitive is the wireless industry? It really depends who you ask.
Members of the Federal Communications Commission approved the agency's 14th annual report on the state of competition in the sector. But in remarks at Thursday's monthly meeting, the commissioners made it plain that there are wide gulfs in their assessments of the wireless industry.
But the Republican commissioners had a markedly different interpretation of the report's findings, highlighting the hefty capital expenditures the carriers have reported and several data points indicating that large majorities of consumers have their choice of multiple mobile voice and broadband providers.
"If nothing else, the report shows that the wireless sector is dynamic and ever improving and responsive to consumer demand," said Commissioner Robert McDowell, warning that it "appears to lay the foundation for more regulation."
CTIA, the principal trade association representing the wireless industry, echoed those concerns.
"We are very concerned...about the potential misuse of 'policy levers' that are referenced in the report and believe that any attempt to add regulation to wireless as a result of this report would be both misguided and harmful to consumers," CTIA President and CEO Steve Largent said in a statement.
Today's report, which evaluates the state of the wireless market in 2008 and much of 2009, is one of several congressionally mandated competition assessments, and figures to serve as a framework for the policy work the FCC will pursue in the industry over the coming year, particularly when it comes to the evaluation of any mergers in the sector.
The FCC approved the report with affirmative votes from the three Democratic commissioners and concurring votes from the two Republicans, who objected that the annual report, for the first time in years, did not reach the express conclusion that there is effective competition in the industry.
Ruth Milkman, the chief of the FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, explained that the report departed from previous years' analyses by broadening its scope to focus on the entirety of the mobile ecosystem, including devices, infrastructure, spectrum and other issues that relate to competition. Under the new approach, the staff opted to refrain from including sweeping conclusions in this year's report.
"What we set out to do when we started drafting this report was to collect the facts and to analyze them," Milkman said. "We wanted to expand the report. We wanted to cover these areas in greater depth -- we wanted to slice and dice the data in ways that hadn't been done before. But we were focusing on the data and the analysis rather than on the conclusions, so we thought we would just lay out for the commissioners all the data and analysis and stop there."
For Largent, that explanation fell short.
"While we understand that the commission is not making any conclusion about the state of competition in the market, nor are they suggesting that the marketplace has changed to the detriment of consumers during 2008, we nonetheless are disappointed and confused as to why they've chosen not to make a finding of 'effective competition' for that year," he said.
The commissioners seized on different data points to draw their own conclusions about competition in the wireless market. McDowell and fellow Republican Commissioner Meredith Baker cited the report's finding that more than 91 percent of Americans have the choice of at least four wireless providers, while nearly 99 percent are served by at least two.
The report also found that 76 percent of households have access to at least three mobile broadband providers, up from the figure of 51 percent reported in last year's evaluation.
McDowell argued that those figures should give the FCC pause before embarking on regulatory inquiries such as the